

That user base is a drop in the ocean compared to most of reddits user base, and those people have all left already.
That user base is a drop in the ocean compared to most of reddits user base, and those people have all left already.
This is a contributor post, not a Forbes official article.
I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.
I don’t know how true that is, but if you believe it then until a forbes staffer writes about it in an official capacity, it hasn’t actually hit Forbes.
Before tablets, parents didn’t survive.
So the developers claim, but the users still encounter it, and the bug report stays open for 22 years … possibly more.
So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing?
Removed by mod
So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing??
I really don’t know how to be any more clear with this question.
I read the article too, and those things you quoted sound to me like things every app does.
Hence my question: what is different here?
There’s not a word in this article about why this breach of privacy matters while others do not. It’s not stated whether this was in the terms of service for the app, and whether those terms were ruled against.
All kinds of apps have been selling personal information for a long time, and it’s been ruled before that it’s allowed if they have the proper legalese in the terms of service. Did this app just not have any terms of service?
Why is it a breach of privacy for this app, but other apps doing the same selling of personal data is not?
You forgot the part where we all return to poverty so the rich can stay rich in the face of climate change.
Easy fix: don’t offer support
More expensive easy fix: contract with a call center in India to do “support” for you.
Maybe $100. Almost all of the upgrades were printed. I bought an all metal hotend and a glass bed. I think that’s it. Probably more like $70.
Ew no. I’m still on my ender 3 pro version 1 from 2019. It’s upgraded to the teeth and works great.
There’s no way I’d throw away all that work for a locked down corporate spy machine that uses lots of proprietary, nonstandard parts.
It just means he can’t do it by himself.
Yours won’t be perfect, but you can do the whole thing by yourself.
“made to be less hated,”
They still want to be hated, just less.
Who’s the halfwit that came up with that line lmao
Dumb TVs are called “digital signage” now.
Caffeine is pretty well studied and it’s known that the long term health effects are nothing close to cocaine. I doubt if there was any good science back then on the long term effects of cocaine, let alone enough education for the populace to know and understand it.
However social perceptions may change anyway. What we consider as not serious may be considered much more serious in the future. For example many people get headaches or even migraines as a withdrawal symptom of caffeine, and we don’t consider a headache to be serious.
But I saw a Star Trek episode once where Picard gets a headache and it was a big deal because those had been solved for hundreds of years by that time! Turns out the ferengi were controlling his mind or something. So caffeine may be considered a serious drug in the future if it interferes with the detection of alien mind control devices.
How does the notification daemon in Linux work? It’s all local and has been around for ages, why can’t we do that?
Can you cite a case where an American company with no holdings or dealings in the EU was fined successfully?
If the company has no infrastructure within the jurisdiction of the gdpr, how can they hope to enforce it?
So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?
That’s the one good selling point I’ve heard for vinyl so far.