
Amazing: surprisingly simple, yet complex and fun! Also there’s the added bonus that you get to vent, ha.
Amazing: surprisingly simple, yet complex and fun! Also there’s the added bonus that you get to vent, ha.
Using the first entry for steal
on the English wiktionary:
To take illegally, or without the owner’s permission, something owned by someone else without intending to return it.
So, if you can’t actually own stuff, you can’t (by definition) steal it.
I get your point, and this more of an AcKsHuALly type of argument, but it’s an fun way of begging the question of what “I own this” means in today’s society.
The easiest to grasp at a glance is Upvotes/Downvotes
.
Though I understand how Score + Upvote%
would be useful, percentages are impactful when there’s more than 100 reactions (which is uncommon).
I love this being a reply instead of an edit, ha.
Thanks for laying out what calculations would be needed, and why it may be a little harder to parse for a layperson.
thought about it, too!
(and… not sure if it’s Jerboa, but the image appears emoji-sized to me. a bite-sized comic, hehe)
Agreed. It’s a deal breaker.
It takes out of the equation how many people actually interacted with it at first glance.
Edit: The 10% downvote is the most reasonable of the bunch. Please let it be configurable.
showing all votes was my main reason to use jerboa over the others. it’d be preferable if it were a toggle.
is this common for xkcd? because then I’ve been missing a whole layer of all the comics I’ve stumbled upon.
thanks! I didn’t know it was a bug; i liked it. could it become a feature? it’s nice to reach the end of the feed.
Interesting are all the points you share. I’ve never been so convinced to try a game even after being explicitly told it’ll not be fun. Give me that sweet pain.
I don’t think it’s perceived as good? (curious, why would it be?) Just that it’s disingenuous to market it as AI. Everyone and their mother now has “”“AI”“” 🤷♂️
I assume having them split by the predefined categories, instead of juggling all the open windows.
Then again, I don’t know other alt-tab options.
I’ve never not had this issue while writing a comment since I first downloaded it, back to v0.0.35 around 2 months ago. Hopefully it’ll be addressed soon.
It’s quite frustrating, but I ended up being used to work around it (mainly tapping multiple times to the end of the comment). Feels like whacking an old TV to make it work.
Not constructive in the least, but I get your frustration of it crashing constantly. You could try designing a better app for a change.
If not, submit an issue on GitHub; though I’m sure it’s being worked on. What version have you downloaded?
yes, it’s been crashing consistently and randomly since the last update. I will try your solution of the avatars and report back.
thanks in advance!
at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.
so when bp = 300x - 3, this:
4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
would turn to
4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though
just picture it:
4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000