lets just say his audience isn’t tech savy. But somehow they try Linux and like it. I think its definitely a win, because even non tech savvy can enjoy Linux.

Shameless plug, but if you want something offline, with rich text, tagging, trees, quick search, small, and encrypted…

You can use treedome! https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/releases/tag/0.5.4

Preem.

Youre going to short it?

My biggest gripe with minetest is the lack of support for large worlds. Honestly most of the times I won’t even touch the border, but there’s always a feeling of “end” when I’m playing minetest (or its forks/mods). As if playing it isn’t worth it.

I did, but every time I made one, it lacked “soul”. So if I want to do some aabstract stuff, I’d rather use inkscape myself instead.

Tell me what you think afterwards!

It is an option, but for now, I want to prioritise Debian based OS first, as many people uses it.

For now the links is still on the horizon, I think its doable though, even with encryption. Tauri have been a good friend in the development phase, it does what it do fine. Sometimes I need to get my head around a performance spike though, just found out linux tauri (gtkwebkit i think) doesnt play well with shadows css. It slows the damn thing.

The docs are very thorough, for my usecase anyway.

treedome_0.5.4_amd64.deb is the linux build. For now I provide for debian, nix (new version on the way), and arch linux

Didn’t they contacted the owners mom about this? Fucking disgusting practices.

Really? There is a law already for this?

I think we need a very strict regulation, where the wording is never “purchase” or “buy” or “own”. It should always be “rent”. Because that’s what it is.

Youre right damn

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes “the data must be open”. The data used for training must be obtainable.

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

How about a license which will also make the collective work into the same license as the work itself? Coverage as in it could reach more in terms of copyleft-ness.

Ah yes, the little old interrupt

Man this is a Bruh moment comment from me, My bad guys

So its activitypub, but worse because its designed from the ground up to be difficult to federate? Bro just use twitter at this point.