

Hold on a second. For it to be enshittified, it has to be good at the beginning, and I highly doubt that’s possible.
Hold on a second. For it to be enshittified, it has to be good at the beginning, and I highly doubt that’s possible.
I still think this format sucks because the punchline comes first.
And then you program a runtime that calls an AI to parse images and execute your code in real-time!
Honestly I though somebody was using drones to throw shit at people below.
Notice that it hasn’t amongst mainstream consumers.
What? A niche technical hobby isn’t popular among mainstream consumers? Wow!
Mainstream consumers don’t know words “Plex” and “Home Assistant” either. There are already products that target these people. And there are products targeted at technical people. We need diversity.
It’s like the same but with a background color that has rounded corners.
I for once can’t stand the idea of having my editor run inside a browser…
Well, don’t run it inside a browser then. There is no need to get agitated because of that option. But this is super useful for universities and other organizations that educate people. They can run these preconfigured IDEs for their students and execute the code on the same server, so that even if you have something like a Chromebook, you can participate in classes. This is what places like Harvard do, and this is how Microsoft introduces CS students to VSCode and other products.
I’d argue that the system shouldn’t automatically convert negative numbers to positive numbers. Instead, it should display an error to the user. Of course, that’s an abstract thought as I don’t know what was the system and who interacted with it.
Why would I want to track his jet though?
Pear to pear communication.
Don’t some try to locate public access points nearby? Or is it just an internet myth?
Here, take it: )
I tried filters on other platforms, the results weren’t that good. Yes, you blocked a word, but people often use images with text for some reason, and filters don’t work with them.
Yeah, any business would have to either accept this request or leave the market. Jack Dorsey has no relation to that.
But they can use some other instance. With centralized platforms the issue is that they want to do business everywhere. Russia threatened to arrest Google employees in Moscow, for instance. Even without such threats, they want to have access to local markets. That isn’t a concern for some instance in Ireland that is supported by donations.
It’s a common dictionary, which is probably not very good in this context. I think it would be more appropriate to refer to ISTQB, as it is likely the most relevant source when it comes to software testing and failures:
Human beings make errors (mistakes), which produce defects (faults, bugs), which in turn may result in failures. Humans make errors for various reasons, such as time pressure, complexity of work products, processes, infrastructure or interactions, or simply because they are tired or lack adequate training
Or to put it simple:
We’re seeing a failure here.
What costs money is testing phases, including a lab to hold and propogate immortal cell lines and later production lines to create enough doses for thousands of human trials.
Thank you. These arguments are always hard to read. Sure, small labs are where it usually starts, but without enormous and risky investments, we would never have the drugs we have today. Most of these investments fail miserably, so one successful drug must cover the costs of ten unsuccessful ones. Nobody would do that if their IP weren’t protected. It’s more about reputation than facts when it comes to this topic.
In business environments this can help employers spy on their employees. That’s how, I guess.