

Ooh thanks I’ll give that a try
Ooh thanks I’ll give that a try
This model is almost entirely overhangs with small gaps between them, making support removal a pain. This way uses less filament and makes for better quality
Just supports, I had to manually paint them in to prevent the slicer from putting them all the way up the side
D) spend millions developing an AI to generate the boilerplate generator badly
Yeah, I’d say Kitty and Alacritty work pretty well on Linux. Makes this comparison table seem like bs
Ah right, thank you, I missed that somehow
I wonder how much this will affect the power usage during boot on my laptop with its integrated AMDGPU. Granted, boot time is fairly short so hopefully this won’t really matter.
I’m tempted to publish an NPM package to do so as a joke, but I fear that it’d get used seriously
However it should be noted that the remote development connection is via their servers, which makes it somewhat less useful
Ah ok, the name implies it’s a security guard
I love that you’re thinking about how to secure sensitive parts of JS applications, however I wonder what threat this is guarding against. Can you give an example? Surely if an attacker can modify the source to call the sensitive functions, then they could modify the allow list
Oh wow, this is amazing info. Thanks!
Nice article! I’m a fan of the “don’t optimise early” mantra, which seems particularly relevant here regarding clone
I feel like this is a perfect encapsulation of how an experienced self-aware developer thinks. Experience really beats the hard stances out of you. I find myself saying “it depends” and “a bit of column A, bit of column B” often, like a cheap kids toy
His take strangely acknowledges that defects are caused by programmers, yet doesn’t want to improve the tools we use to help us not make these mistakes. In summary, git gud.
Experience has taught me that I’m awfully good at finding and firing foot guns, and when I use a language that has fewer foot guns along with good linting, I write reliable code because I tend to focus on what I want the code to do, not how to get there.
Declarative functional programming suits me down to the ground. OOP has been friendly to me, mostly, but it also has been the hardest to understand when I come back to it. Experience has given me an almost irrational aversion to side effects, and my simple mind considers class members as side effects
Yeah, this is my colleagues waiting for me, poor bastards
I recommend LunarVim for VS Code users too
Annoyingly this feature isn’t available in Edge on Linux
I’m thinking evaporative cooling (paired with refrigerative cooling)
That’s a great idea and would require similar amounts of support, however there’s still going to be 90 degree overhangs that wouldn’t come out quite as nice as the orientation I used
The model in question only has 1 flat side, its end (which is the top in the photo). Every other side requires supports if it’s on the build plate because of the recess in the cap, and the cap being wider than the rest of the model