but if cheesecake factory hired him and supported him to make this discovery, you would look at the menu differently.

Creative passion? In mobile games? What are you on?

I mean all the shitty mobile games for the past decade or so are very much human generated garbage. What’s wrong about having AI doing the repetitive work and have human do the creative part? I mean I get it that you are worried the companies are going to use it wrong, but you can also agree there are good ways to use it yes? Or you are fundamentally against using AI entirely?

Where did you get the sense SE is like that? Or their new CEO operates that way?

But why not? If an industry isn’t already fully automated, AI can be considered no?

Do you really don’t know why, or are you being sarcastic?

If I am on a 20 minutes drive I need the damn thing to keep playing music for 20 minutes, not just randomly stop playing halfway through a song. YTM does that. Spotify doesn’t. Nor does my other background players.

Music would randomly stop playing. I can just continue it, no error or warning. Spotify doesn’t do that, nor does other background media players.

Okay, it isn’t just me who find YTM buggy.

As a music player, could it please play music? Jesus.

Did RedHat say that? This is a pretty problematic statement so I would really love to see the exact text in which they set their position.

It has been reported that the support contract from RedHat says you can’t redistribute the source you receive as part of being a paid customer and they reserve the right to cancel your support contract.

Where is the report? I mean yeh if that’s what RedHat said then they have chosen the path of getting sued to oblivion, but that’s not what the initial argument is about, and that’s also not what Rocky’s new path forward indicates. (https://www.phoronix.com/news/Rocky-Linux-RHEL-Source-Access)

Did RedHat add that restriction? GPL requires source to be distributed along with binary, but the distributor can still decide who to distribute things to. If the only way to access binary is through being a paying customer, I don’t see why RedHat can’t say only paying customers can get access to source.

What’s the GPL violation in that, or did I misunderstand RedHat’s new policy?

The free as in freedom principle isn’t violated. GPL stands. So why all the rage? People call RedHat IBMified, what the hell does it even mean? Has IBM done anything to the community?

Really there is no principle being defended. People’s workflow isn’t even impacted as it stands, they just have to figure out new paths going forward.

Time won’t solve how people are. Most people will treat free as free of charge instead of freedom.

I don’t think he even consider people not right around him his employees.

GUI is hard to build right and expensive to build at all. CLI tools is much cheaper to build and can be scripted. Microsoft is rich that’s why they can build GUI, and even then sysadmins have asked for Linux type of CLI tools so they can automate. So generally unlike consumer tools, sysadmin tools focus on utility instead of ease of use.

You can’t. If you are on beehaw you need a beehaw account to respond.

But why do you need to be on beehaw? Is the community you want to look at not available to lemmy.world?

Top of the home page there should be a switch to select showing all comments vs threads.

I am only 90 hours in, can’t really comment.

So far so good.

Don’t underestimate them. They do hold the most number of patents in solid state battery. They weren’t exactly sitting idle over the past few decades.