If you can read this you are too close

  • 0 Posts
  • 76 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 7th, 2024

help-circle

  • I think nobody understands exactly how anything works, but enough of us understand our own little corner of tech to make new things and keep the older things going. I’ve been coding for decades, and proudly state I understand about 1% of what I do. This is higher than most

    AI will make these little gardens of knowledge smaller for most, and yet again we, as the human species, will forever rely on another layer of tech.








  • The mit license allows a mix of public and commercial code run by the same company, with minimal legal issues. One can use other tactics I am sure, but this one seems good when the commercial code absolutely needs the public code .

    I think some confusion here can be resolved by stating this is anti foss, taking advantage of foss, it is capitalism taking advantage of having a good code base while making sure any contribution from outside the company is minimized. At the same time it gives my company absolute control over the private part.

    Usually get into arguments here! I’m not defending it, but am saying open source would be less without.



  • Speaking for myself, it’s because future monetization can be easier under mit when using a foss utility and private code.

    My project would not exist at all unless there were ways to make money off it.

    True, others can also use that same code too, in the exact same way, but that requires quite the investment, and those of us that are doing this are banking on not getting the interest of a monopoly in that way. We are competing against other small businesses who have limited resources.

    At the same time the free part can get a boost by the community.

    I comment a lot in politics here, and am sometimes an ass, so cannot name this project


  • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    He is not wrong. Unless people start to take steps , the dependency of tech will be used to chain most of us. Granted, these chains will be the kindest and gentlest chains seen in a long time.

    Social revolution lives on in decentralized services, like this; the true battles will be later though. This year is a mild warm up. I can’t imagine the challenges that await many





  • In some situations with some people yes. It’s really hard to separate the project and team.

    Usually, projects I have seen start with the best plans and methods, or at least vague good intentions, but later pretend they never met them. Like a cheap date.

    There are some projects that naturally lend themselves to one approach or other, and they last longer following the original guidelines ; but if a project lives long enough these guidelines become the enemy.

    I think the only projects that follow any set of guidelines for longer than a few years; they have a narrow purpose for being. Straightforward evolution or needs