This is looking good, thanks.

Thanks.

Does not seem to support tracking ETFs unfortunately.

They also noted that unauthorized streams of illegally obtained (and) unreleased games compromise Nintendo’s prerelease marketing, which is an offense Keighin allegedly committed over 50 times, infringing copyright of 10 different Nintendo titles in the process.ľlľ

Come on… We are not talking about streamimg an old game (modified or not) on an emulator.

The guy played a game before it was even released and streamed it… And not only once, but with 10 different games. What an idiot… Was probably warned and ignored it, just like the court hearing…

I’m not sure what you are trying to say.

My point was from the beginning that I don’t want to create 2 accounts when I report a bug a bug on Forgejo instance 1 and on instance 2.

The suggestion whether I have heard about git does not solve anything about that…

Some one else here mentioned that it’s possible to login with Mastodon on each of the instance, which is the correct direction (allows to report a bug on both instances via an external account). Disadvantage is still: My 2 bug reports are not linked to each other, because there is no shared Forgejo profile, which would actually require something like federation.

FYI Forgejo supports mastodon login

That’s interesting. Did not even know, Mastodon supported doing something like this…

There is still a difference: There is no profile in the end. I might create 2 bug reports, bit they won’t be linked to each other.

I agree that it’s already kind of decentralized, so I also added the word “federated” to my original post.

Yeah, that was my point in the first comment… But not only that…

The development with multiple people is decentralized, yes…

But even, if I add 3 remotes to my repo (1 to GitHub, 1 to Forgejo instance A and 1 to Forgejo instance B), guess what happens, if you don’t have an account on each of these… Try pushing code or making a pull request and see how it fails, because you are not authenticated…

I did not mean decentralized hosting of the projects (e.g. your project will be on all instances).

I meant decentralized account usage (e.g. you can use your example.com forgejo account to create an issue on otherexample.org)… Just like Lemmy… I could use my reddthat.com lemmy account to create a post on your instance lemmy.world without having to register there.

There is no command git issue create [hostname] [title] [description] and if there was such a command, it’d require authentication on the specific instance to prevent spam.

You still need to create an account on each Forgejo instance to report a bug there…

And even, if you commit code or make a pull request… Git might be decentralized (you can develop with your friend independently from each other and merge it), but try to commit code to a GitHub project, GitLab instance or Forgejo instance without having an account there to authenticate yourself… It won’t work.

We need something like Forgejo, but decentralized and federated, like Lemmy. I don’t want to create a new account for every Forgejo instance, just to be able to report a bug…

Edit: Added “and federated”

I played it for the first time a few months ago.

Controlling the character felt quite unintuitive at first on PS4, but after some time and explanations from a friend, I managed to play it through.

I enjoyed it.

What the frick?

Too late… You started a war in the comments. I’ll proudly fight for my country’s way to separate numbers!!! :)

We (in Europe) probably should be thankful that you are not using feet as thousands-separator over there in the USA… Or maybe separate after each 2nd digit, because why not… ;)

Yes. It’s the normal Thousands-separator notation in Germany for example.

Me and my 5.000 closest friends don’t like that the website and their 1.300 partners all need my data.

Me neither. Unfortunately not open source…

WestNordOst seems to be the user name of the main developer.

How exactly is the data used, does it go back to openstreetmaps?

I can give you one example. If you go to a bench and answer the question “Is it still there” with “yes”, the bench object tracked by OpenStreetMaps will get a tag that is similar to “last-checked-for-existance: 03/16/2025”. If you answer “no”, it might get removed from the OSM database. So, yes, it results in changes in the OpenStreetMap database.

Tethered to commercial Jawg.io for map tiles

Not sure, what that means, sorry.

I have also linked the FAQ (which are by the way hosted by OpenStreetMap) ->https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#How_does_the_app_handle_uploads?

I, personally, am below rank 5,000 with over 400 contributions.

Great. And using CURL on the phone to access the list, I guess…