On the contrary, there is a lot of professional software that doesn’t run on Windows!

… battery heaters and block heaters are a thing for ICE too though?

FYI: there is actually an XKCD font if you want to match the original more closely. https://github.com/ipython/xkcd-font

It takes a while to gather the data, new areas all the time.

No, the plant is full of primary batteries! 4.2 million AA cells!

Ah, perhaps my source was off. Thanks for the additional data.

But looking at it another way, nuclear is less than twice coal. Estimating the cost of that georgia plant would put it at $16-17B, so those overruns would be atypical.

But my main point on cost is that government investment has been lacking in nuclear compared to renewables: https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertbryce/2021/12/27/why-is-solar-energy-getting-250-times-more-in-federal-tax-credits-than-nuclear/?sh=4a783c3221cf

Without investment, it’s going to stay just as expensive. And the main regulating body not having a mandate to develop the technology has just been holding us back.

A coal power plant is rougly the same cost per GW as solar or wind, doesn’t mean we should build more of them. I agree it’s expensive, but so were solar and wind a couple decades ago. Government investment helped research, development, scaling up - imagine if that had been done in the '80s, we wouldn’t be building natural gas plants right now.

Burying it in the ground with no considerations for leachants is not what nuclear disposal is.

Nuclear is the most regulated one. Start requiring full recycling / disposal of solar or wind and how expensive do they get?

Hydro is best as a giant battery bank, and pairs quite well with nuclear.

They’ve had to keep upgrading them - the percentage of nuclear is the same, but no new plants have been built, so that extra power has come from research on how close to the red line they can actually run.

Try breaking it down by county.

Why not try it now?

Can you browse web on your tv? That would work.

Heads up! Jellyfin is a great alternative!

…because they were being sold?

Well, the article would seem to add one more giant upside for Jellyfin.

Turns out it’s 1000 knots (~600m/s), or 18,000 feet. So it’s the altitude in this case. But a slow-moving drone at <18,000ft is fine.

Maybe a misapplication then. I’ve run into it with model rocketry before (for good reason)

The GPS chips have internal limits on how fast they think they can move. If they determine that they are moving faster than 300m/s they will stop outputting any results for a period of time. This limit is, IIRC, put in at the silicon level, so only military chips can bypass it.

If you try to use mapping apps on a plane you sometimes run into this issue.