IninewCrow

I had to look at the date of when this stupid article was written … most sane people were saying this over a year ago.

Now the NYT is making it sound like its some new revelation?

This photo was taken ten minutes before the first ever rage quit in a video game to occur … the lab was set on fire and two players and an innocent bystander were hospitalized

Instead of mass migration, they should just institute small changes to small sections or areas or groups … just slowly erode the windows userbase over a period of about four or five or even ten years. Once it reaches a critical mass at some point … then you can just cut the cord altogether and change over everything and everyone.

This is like asking tobacco farmers what their thoughts are on smoking.

… and generating AI porn, so much AI porn, it will destroy humanity with so much AI porn

It was deep fried before being placed in the burger

Newspapers, magazines, TV, film, movies, broadcasts are all regulated nationally and internationally

The same should be done for corporate social media companies who basically deliver all or most news content and information to people everywhere today.

The current state of the world is like being in the 1900s and only having six major newspapers in the world owned by big corporations and none of the content they publish or share is regulated or controlled.

Democracy and the power of people don’t seem to do much to oligarchs

But money and wealth and the ability to win or lose great fortune is the only thing that brings them down.

Just goes to show how easy it is to get these people upset.

Just call them out

Call them often

Call them out every day

Never stop calling them out … you’ll know they’re listening when someone either tells you or forces you to stop.

Nazis and authoritarians every single one of them.

That is a great film that I should watch again … and so should everyone

Technological development and the future of our civilization is in control of a handful of idiots.

It’s what I’ve been saying about technology for the past decade or two … we’ve hit an upper limit to our technological development … that limit is on individual human greed where small groups of people or massively wealthy people hinder or delay any further development because they’re always trying to find ways to make money off it, prevent others from making money off it, monopolize an area or section of society … capitalism is literally our world’s bottleneck and it’s being choked off by an oddly shaped gold bar at this point.

They should program the actions and reactions of each system to actual battle bots and then televise the event for our entertainment.

If they are honest about what they are suggesting … the first step would be to be explicitly clear about who THEY are and WHO they represent.

I really don’t care that much about the technical side of things because I’m not that technically knowledgeable. However, I am more apt to trust the judgment or recommendations of prominent people in the industry (that are not corporately attached or controlled) … I would also trust public institutions or journalists or academics with a track record of social advocacy and wanting to represent people instead of corporations or businesses. I would also trust politicians or political advocates that mostly represent people and public institutions.

I really don’t put my faith in any one person no matter who they claim to be to just say they want to build something meaningful and give me no information on their background, who they worked for, who they represent or what kind of people or organizations they associate with. There have been far too many ‘good natured’ technocrats and technology people from the past decade or two who claim to say that they want to change the world for the better and then end up wanting to burn it all down for a profit.

Depending on who the group is … it is good to first do a thorough check on who the group is … it can just as likely be a group of scam artists that are riding on some nationalism band wagon happening around the world these days.

The best solution is to just stop interacting with the site for anything … don’t engage, don’t repost, don’t edit, don’t change, don’t salt bad data, don’t post nonsense … just stop engaging, get off the site and never input anything there ever again. Sure go back and look at things, just don’t engage any more and don’t add to the trash heap that has grown into a mountain range on humanity.

In the late 90s and early 2000s, internet search engines were designed to actually find relevant things … it’s what made Google famous

Since the 2010s, internet search engines have all been about monetizing, optimizing, directing, misdirecting, manipulating searches in order to drive users to the highest paying companies or businesses, groups or individuals that best knew how to use Search Engine Optimization. For the past 20 years, we’ve created an internet based on how we can manipulate everyone and everything in order to make someone money. The internet is no longer designed to freely and openly share information … it’s now just a wasteland of misinformation, disinformation, nonsense and manipulation because we are all trying to make money off one another in some way.

AI is just making all those problems bigger, faster and more chaotic. It’s trying to make money for someone but it doesn’t know how yet … but they sure are working on trying to figure it out.

So … what is the leading alternative browser then?

One of the reasons Firefox became so popular was that it was an alternative.

Now that they’re drifting towards something we don’t like … what is the new alternative?

Agreed, I use it with as few options and extensions as possible. I don’t want to start creating a complex system of notes that will rely on anything specific. I try to stick to the core functions without any extras because of the worry of eventually falling into a proprietary black hole. I keep my foot in just enough to get my uses but not so much that I might get stuck with the software.