

Reading this made me wonder if I was having a stroke, because it seems like English but I don’t recognize so many of the words. 👴
Reading this made me wonder if I was having a stroke, because it seems like English but I don’t recognize so many of the words. 👴
My point is that if your variable can be None
then you need the same pattern for the length check.
So for the Pythonic version:
if (foo is not None) and not foo:
...
For the explicit length check:
if (foo is not None) and (len(foo) == 0):
...
Honestly you’re probably better off using type hints and catching such things with static checks and not adding the None
check.
You’d need to explicitly check for None if using the len() construct as well, so this doesn’t change the point of the article.
My ad blocker has blocked all pictures on this article, so I can’t say. 😄
We’ve had a similar ban in the Netherlands for a year or two now. Mobile phones were already not allowed in classes. Kids seem to have survived.
I looked a few years ago when a friend of my partner got a Tesla a few years ago. Picking a color cost like €2000 or so.
Sarcasm is a type of irony.
I always look on itch.io and GoG first!
I don’t think that they were being ironic…
Yes the article says to leave your phone if you can, and to use a burner phone otherwise.
$1 $2 per month is expensive? 🤣
[edit: I can’t do simple math]
The claim was “Email server owners don’t look at the content”. This is untrue since possibly the largest owner of email servers looks at the content to monetize the service. That’s all.
Yeah, the largest email company is probably Google (maybe Microsoft). Google definitely looks at every email they receive for users!
I don’t really know much about French politics, but surely there is something similar that right wing reactionaries can get upset about there.
For example a Dutch friend of mine who has been radicalized by Joe Rogan, Twitter, and Facebook tells me that you can’t say anything bad about Islam in Holland, as he sends me link after link with fascist anti-Muslim propaganda. (Like… you can’t say things that the “news” that you just sent me is literally saying?)
I feel personally attacked.
I wish people would stop conflating energy with electricity.
So Germany had ⅔ of it’s electricity from renewables, but still has gas for warming homes, petrol for cars, diesel for trucks, and so on.
Maybe up until they stopped having “don’t be evil” as their company motto?
Stock options and grants are a tool to trick you into accepting lower pay and conflating your interests with those of the capital class. (Speaking as someone who has received both!)
From RFC 2804:
- The IETF believes that adding a requirement for wiretapping will make affected protocol designs considerably more complex. Experience has shown that complexity almost inevitably jeopardizes the security of communications even when it is not being tapped by any legal means; there are also obvious risks raised by having to protect the access to the wiretap. This is in conflict with the goal of freedom from security loopholes.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2804/
This was written in 2000 in response to US government requests to add backdoors to voice-over-IP (VoIP) standards.
It was recognized 25 years ago that having tapping capabilities is fundamentally insecure.
From the link you provide:
I mean, maybe it shouldn’t have been done?