It’s funny how the reason is always that linux enables cheating by being open, but maybe cheaters wouldn’t be aware of linux at all had all the anti-cheat companies not been talking about it being a problem for the last 3 years.

Chicken?

For me it was having the audacity to state Holodomor was real, while denying it is actually a crime in my county. Looking it up it actually isn’t, but it’s widely accepted to have happened and is taught in history lessons.

For me it’s categorizing radical ideologies correctly. I just hate people throwing around buzzwords, calling anyone a communist/fascist they disagree with. Those words have meanings. You can actually be worse then the fascists and still not be one, it’s not impossible. You can still be hated for that, but you didn’t automatically become one, because you are right-wing and coincidentally an asshole. But the moment someome calls you a fascist, while you’re just an asshole, their opinon automatically becomes invalid and wrong.

Don’t get fooled, that’s called stockholm syndrome.

I think it’s a paraphrase of a culturally significant webcomic inserted into a more modern context without it’s original meaning being altered.

If someone is seriously a supremacist about using darkmode I think their input is invalid enough to be discarded.

On the other hand I don’t think downvoting someone you disagree with on anything is in itself toxic, but going out of your way to downvote someone over something this - let’s be honest - unimportant is sort of stupid.

EDIT: To be clear I’m saying darkmode is unimportant not the issue of people being toxic.

“Couldn’t count all the stuff”

Name a linux distro after her and yourself. Always works.

That’s torture and is outlawed by the geneva convention (btw)