We have different ideas to put the teeth inside the mouth. We could transplant the young tooth cells at the location of the missing tooth and let them grow inside mouth. Alternatively, we could create the whole tooth in the lab before placing it in the patient’s mouth.

I assume option 1 at least would lead to the nerve connections naturally growing as the tooth does. Regardless, this still seems in the super early lab-proof-of-concept stage so I guess the ultimate answer is we don’t know yet.

It’s a monoid in the category of endofunctors. Obviously.

Aww a whole new generation of devs get to make the same mistakes SOAP made. Makes me feel all fuzzy inside.

You volunteering?

Do people not read compiler errors or something? Finding missing semicolons is easy.

)

Time for the UK government to make good on all that money we spent rescuing OneWeb…

I’ll take “why is my codebase full of technical debt” for 500, Alex.

Feels like it would be quicker and easier just to write the code myself at that point…

Sure but who’s got time for all that aggravation? Especially if it’s not part of the codebase I have to work with personally. LGTM and let it be someone else’s problem.

https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/386194/why-do-we-still-grow-the-stack-backwards

TL;DR: For historical reasons stacks growing down is defined in hardware on some CPUs (notably x86). On other CPUs like some ARM chips for example you (or more likely your compiler’s developer) can technically choose which direction stacks go but not conforming to the historical standard is the choice of a madman.

I think the sky is a mod, though i’m not 100% sure because i haven’t played vanilla in years.

The true Skyrim experience.

‘EA/BioWare owns the IP but you can’t own an idea’

Isn’t owning ideas the whole point of IP laws?

I’m Luigi and so’s my wife

Gotta love Microsoft Power Bisexual

True programming chads don’t index at all, they just bind functions to the list monad.

Well yes, but not many these days will make the effort to (try to) return that save to you in a working state.

Gonna need a bit more than that to go on. Was its functionality similar to exiv2? Can you at least link the old SO post you found?

git rebase -i

“Fixed stuff”
…
“Fixed for real this time”