

They follow robots.txt
They follow robots.txt
There are different kinds of AI scraper defenses.
This one is an active strategy. No shit people know that this costs them resources. The point is that they want to punish the owners of bad-behaved scrapers.
There is also another kind which just blocks anything that tries to follow an invisible link that goes to a resource forbidden by robots.txt
Aw, didn’t know that! Maybe make an issue? Yakuake works under Wayland, so there’s nothing that should stop them
Yes, it calls that its “quick terminal” feature
Exactly the same here. I went Nexus->Pixel 2->Pixel 6
Works flawlessly, except of course that I only get like ~28h of battery life instead of the ~48h in the beginning
The article also mentions Cisco briefly, who also suck. Almost as much as Palo Alto
It doesn’t. read the first words behind the link you posted:
Page Status: Outdated
Here is the actual one: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/
Uv and pip do the same thing, uv is just faster.
Hatch has the same role as Poetry or tox: managing environments for you.
Applications should be packaged properly, in a self contained installer for exactly this demographic. It’s not Python’s fault that this isn’t common practice.
Sure, there was some hyperbole. Some people need some specific setuptools plugin or something. Almost nobody.
It’s not a standard, it’s built on standards.
You can also use Poetry (which recently grew standard metadata support) or plain uv venv
if you want to do things manually but fast.
It’s fixed, and the python version had nothing to do with it. Just use hatch
No it’s not. E.g. nobody who starts a new project uses setup.py anymore
Ooo damn that sounds exactly what I’d like to try.
On the other hand I feel like I’m too old for this shit. My system works fine, I understand everything, and things rarely break and never in an unrecoverable way.
It’s been great almost since I started using it.
I started using it exactly when 4.0 came out, because that’s when I started using Linux and I thought learning 3 didn’t make sense. But 4 only got stable around 4.4 I think. The problem was that 4.0 wasn’t intended to be for end users yet, but distributions didn’t realize that and packaged it right away.
KDE didn’t repeat that mistake. 5.0 was almost completely smooth sailing (some applications took a long time to port and looked ugly, that’s it), and 6.0 was completely seamless.
If I had to guess, probably variable refresh rate
No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.
Wrong, the science community is slowly switching to bluesky