If the point of Lemmy is just to generate as many comments as possible with everyone just assuming whatever they want about linked articles without reading them I’ll quickly leave again. I’m here for informed discussion, not for a competition in generating engagement
except for c++ it was just to avoid a single function call, not extra indirection. also on modern compilers size() will get inlined and ultimate instructions generated by the compiler will likely be the same
why comment if you don’t even want to read the article? python lists are not linked lists, they’re contiguous with a smart growth strategy.
good thing about the terminal is it scares most general users so much that they won’t touch it even with instructions. There will be many issues, but I don’t think people running random commands in the terminal will be common
this right here is the issue, people don’t even remember the size smartphone used to be. I’ve got a phone that’s one of the smallest available that still have decent hardware. the screen is still 6.1 inch. your example of a reasonable size is 6.3 inches.
what op and I are actually looking for is something around 5 - 5.3 inches instead, like smartphone used to be. For that size, all that is available today is no-name chinese phones with shit hardware and no support. the big brands are busy selling 6.2 inches as “compact” where it used to be considered phablet size
seems like there’s an issue with case 3. the person_id and from surveillance_records doesn’t match up with the person_id in the hotel_checkins table when joined on hotel-checkin_id
haaave you heard about our lord and saviour Typst?
same layout algorithm as LaTeX, but:
To be a positive impact, they just need to be less carbon intensive thans the energy they displace. According to the first results on google, (presumably utility-scale) solar is about 12 times less carbon intensive than natural gas and 20 times compared to coal. So as long as you’re replacing base load and not utility solar, balcony solar could be as much as 10 times less efficient and still come out a net positive.
Keep in mind also that these numbers keep improving as solar panel manufacturing becomes more efficient and starts using more green energy itself over the coming decades
it works great on desktop using mouse too
true, but try making a half decent PC for the price of one console
I mean, this is also a particularly amateurish implementation. In more sophisticated versions you’d process the user input and check if it is doing something you don’t want them to using a second AI model, and similarly check the AI output with a third model.
This requires you to make / fine tune some models for your purposes however. I suspect this is beyond Gab AI’s skills, otherwise they’d have done some alignment on the gpt model rather than only having a system prompt for the model to ignore
It’s one thing to just use the software, it’s another to open bug tickets that you expect the maintainer to prioritise. It’s free software, the maintainer doesn’t have to do anything for you. If they want tickets fixed with high priority, they should work something out with the maintainer.
Is the current incarnation beatable, or was that a while ago? I’m not making any progress
Desktops are superior even if only for the better cooling options, allowing your chips to sustain higher clockspeeds for longer without the machine sounding like a jet taking off
So from within vim :!pkill vim?
Yes please, I would love not being able to scan comments to see if they are relevant to what I’m trying to do
You could use jq, which will work no matter how the json is formatted.
Without trying it out, something like the following might work:
jq '.path.to.key.to.change |= 11' file.json > file.json.tmp && mv file.json.tmp file.json
hard disagree about the permissions. If I want to run closed source programs like games, discord, zoom or whatever, I like knowing they can’t log all my keys, take screenshots or even run their own version of windows recall without my explicit permission