

WYSIWYG collaboration platform, I guess?
I can’t believe this name wasn’t already taken.
WYSIWYG collaboration platform, I guess?
It finally just came up. Posting here from it now.
The admin last posted almost 2 weeks ago saying he was having a minor surgical procedure and hadn’t publicly posted since. Hopefully he’s okay and fixed this himself, but he’s still silent at the moment.
@ernest, here’s a nsfw screenshot in case it doesn’t appear for you. https://i.imgur.com/il0uZC4.png
There’s a subreddit for everything, including every kink you can imagine.
As a long time relay user but not an Apollo user, my impression from reading all the drama of early June was Apollo had a lot more features than I had seen before, and that was what set it apart from other clients. More features means more API calls, generally.
As an example, I had relay poll for PM once an hour, but I remember seeing Apollo was doing it every few minutes or maybe alongside thread views so notifications were more immediate. The user experience would be better but at the expense of far more API hits.
Wow. I read through most of the pages. What a convoluted system! Besides several new terms that are interdependent and poorly defined, this scheme is going to be impossibly opaque to users and orders of magnitude more complex than upvote/downvote. I especially don’t like that points are directly related to karma, when karma whoring and botting are prevalent. Last thing we need is karma earning one some measure of influence or control in a community.
They clearly think this is something people will simply get used to should they not enthusiastically embrace it. Why they think that in an era of other platforms dumbing down interaction to nothing more than an upvote I can’t wrap my head around.
What a colossal waste of resources. Thankfully it appears to be opt in by sub for now, though I doubt that will last.
Those answers were disappointingly evasive. The questions were clear and he chose non-answers. Yuck.
I thought they removed that recently… Could be wrong, though.