dbx12

Yay, where do I sign up? (Jk, I’m already a beta tester)

I think spoilers are still not working. (Please do not interpret “still” as impatience).

Edit: yup, still not working.

Edit 2: the new 1.0.15 interested support for spoilers, yay!

The alternative is “just serve it as a regular website”. It doesn’t need to be an app to do its job. Name a functionality which only exists in electron but not in the standard browser API.

There was a big git hoster (cough bitbucket cough) who didn’t have support for signed commits until a few months ago. But the signature is only considered good if the pubkey you uploaded contains the mail you use for logging in. Because surely no sane person would have more than one mail, right?

You was m can use user units too if you want them scoped to your user.

Could be stupid input validation which requires ^ssh-rsa

come develop Golang , its good here.

… and other ridiculous cope statements to laugh about

I am in this post and I don’t like it.

I would go nowhere near a drenched feline since the most common version of them is likely in a very bad mood due to being drenched.

PlantUML supports Gantt charts if I remember correctly. Can run locally (java if I’m not mistaken) or via web.

clickops

I think I will steal this.

Ah, the horcrux technique.

A reference to the software engineer who worked 20+ years at Microsoft and then became a goose farmer. The LinkedIn post became viral.

Not an answer, but you don’t need an extension to defeat right-click blocking scripts: shift-right-click usually does the trick.

Really true. I hope “new UI” stays optional until I retire or become a potato farmer. I haven’t worked long enough at Microsoft to deserve geese.

The thing you are thinking about is called TOTP or timed one time password.

When you are allowed into the vicinity of this kind of equipment, you should be able to identify matching shapes without circles in the first place…

Masks don’t only protect from airborne viruses…

Oh, that makes warnings errors and does not mean “ignore errors”. I’m not too familiar with compiler flags. You could do some mental gymnastics to argue that the unused variable causes the compiler to exit and thus the code is not functioning and thus the unused variable is not a warning but an error :^)

I for my part prefer it that way. Makes sure the code stays clean and nobody can just silence the warnings and be done with it. Because why would you accept useless variables that clutter the code in production builds? Imagine coming back after some time and try to understand the code again. At least you have the guarantee the variable is used somehow and not just “hmm, what does this do? … ah, it’s unused”

Unused variable is an error which fails to compile.