Or the even more frustrating OP reply “fixed thanx” with no details on how they fixed it leaving everyone else in the dark.
Or the even more frustrating OP reply “fixed thanx” with no details on how they fixed it leaving everyone else in the dark.
No. They would rather effective age verification that doesn’t negatively impact the privacy and liberties of their users. They want a solution, not just a ham fisted excuse to start building the foundations of a social credit system
I’ve been thinking the same thing. While I like the idea that publishers are responsible for maintaining the needed infrastructure, I can only see that resulting in even more predatory pricing to cover the costs and unreasonable pressure on smaller publishers leading them to fold and leave behind the greedy ones