I liked zimbra the time I used it but it is rather heavyweight complete collaboration suite.

Well since Sony made a model called one, there’s a point in psx for the whole line.

Not only this, but also ‘agile’.

I know. But then Nintendo was making a buck and someone else was being cheap by either not taking the bigger module (to maximize profits) or not optimizing their game sizes like Nintendo often excels at.

I think we’re on the same page but just having different thoughts details in this.

Apologies for maybe answering provocatively basically in the direction of rampant capitalism while agreeing hence triggering your effortful answer of things I know and agree on.

Storage is cheap. Others are being cheap too.

For that I in part understand the switch module price if that’s indeed nvme speed or something.

But switch 1? Not really.

I think no switch 2.

We already have a date for that.

But let’s see!

I think that naming was fully on purpose. People argumented with me that they had their own “servers” so that was good, right?

Grrr.

And it doesn’t weigh anything!

I don’t think they do but mine still works perfectly and is pretty awesome. Also, it uses less power than a lot of modern TVs

It has modern connections but is only smart in a minor way so no laggy menus etc.

Or plasma?

Exactly.

EXPLAIN! EXPLAIN!

EXTERMINATE!

I’m tired of pretending companies are making the world better.

See:

The corporation

The new corporation

It absolutely is an ad.

Mysterious issues with dns. External service solves it!

Me too.

Man people really like taking a beating.

I’m sorry you had to go through this and are suffering. There are people that can (literally) feel your pain, I hope that can give some comfort.

I’m lucky to be in Europe, otherwise I would (very likely) be dead and broke if not.

Faschism influence maybe.

In part we agree. However there are two things to consider.

For one, the llms are plateauing pretty much now. So they are dependant on more quality input. Which, basically, they replace. So perspecively imo the learning will not work to keep this up. (in other fields like nature etc there’s comparatively endless input for training, so it will keep on working there).

The other thing is, as we likely both agree, this is not intelligence. It has it’s uses. But you said to replace programming, which in my opinion will never work: were missing the critical intelligence element. It might be there at some point. Maybe llm will help there, maybe not, we might see. But for now we don’t have that piece of the puzzle and it will not be able to replace human work with (new) thought put into it.

That’s not the way it works. And I’m not even against that.

It sill won’t work this way a few years later.

Yes you’re right, in a way. I have much respect for valve for that.

However the ‘non streamlinedness’ is hidden there. It’s not a closed system like a console.