Hi, filament expert here

This is not funny

Filaments only do this when they are under extreme distress

Fork

Except for the contract employees. Fuck those people.

I mean technically the contractors are not employees

Japan is super into lottery based sales. Even for things like concerts

If you listen closely, you can hear the heads of NSA people banging on their desks because of the funding stop

Doesn’t really affet me much, as my LE cronjob will update the cert either way. Doesn’t really matter if it’s 90 days or 47 (what a weird number of days)

ephemeral single use certs when?

I’m waiting for the new version, fourierst

fyi, you can link with a ! to instances, and they get automatically converted to local user instance links:

[email protected]

They wanted people switching over from big name software to feel right at home

They are doing that only for paying users for 10

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-supports-ends-on-october-14-2025-2ca8b313-1946-43d3-b55c-2b95b107f281

The one weird trick that makes clickbait work

Had a similar discussion multiple times already.

“I can’t give you an estimate. There are way too many unknowns in there”

“Okay. But what if you still give me one?”

Openly shows screen where I roll a random number between 10 and 50 “23 days”

“But why so long?”

“…”

more dev than sysop, but: bitwarden

Will we, though?

Fun fact: that’s Elijah Wood and it’s his first film role

the thing is: the employer has absolutely 0 say on if a person is sick or not. If a doctor says a person can’t work: that’s it. The company 0 in the matter.

In fact, the company isn’t even allowed to ask why a person is sick. An official note from the doctor is all that matters

Abolutely necessarily.

it works like this:

• @privateuser@mastodon.example.com has a “followers only account”.
• @someuser@pixelfed.example.com is a friend of above account, requested access and was granted. This now causes mastodon.example.com to push all messages of @privateuser to pixelfed.example.com.
• @anotheruser@pixelfed.example.com requests access, but gets ignored. But the pixelfed instance marks the user as “follows @privateuser”
• In the interface of @someuser, the messages are shown as expected.
• In the interface of @anotheruser, they are also shown. Because PF basically does a database “select messages of users that the user follows”, without checking if the access was ever granted.

Important to note, that this would not happen, if the messages weren’t already pushed to the server due to the “allowed” user

elaborate

ActivityPub is a half-assed unfinished mess.

tried working on my own service and figured this one out very fast.

It’s amazing that it works at all. 98% of the stuff is not documented at all. and the stuff that is, can hardly be called documentation.