

They don’t need anyone to trust the system, they just need to retain control.
They don’t need anyone to trust the system, they just need to retain control.
My laptop sucks though so I can really only run anything up to Super Nintendo on it
“Luck is one of my skills” when it turns out this entire thing is a terrible idea for the date of humanity.
Or maybe some people aren’t in a position where they can watch a video?
I can imagine thinking it’s be funny in the early stages where things wouldn’t really be too logical they way they are now. Might even assume it wouldn’t actually do anything and I could just pull it back out.
This was the last Zelda game I played, but I couldn’t really get the hang of it since I really went into it expecting OoT 2: Eclectic Boogaloo, and OoT was really the best thing I’d seen up until then regardless of franchise. Then I saw all the cool stuff being done in later games with all the amazing tech that was being developed but I just couldn’t get around to have the time or patience necessary to sit and play anymore.
It’s a play on words, I like fish and the name Dan.
Calm down, Will.
I think you honestly have to compare the things he takes credit for with the things he openly does singlehandedly. It’s not just positive vs negative and assigning responsibility blindly.
That actually makes a lot more sense, I’ll accept that. Although there are signs saying not to misuse the tools provided. Don’t see any of that on Amazon. At least not yet.
You’re right on that one. Just seems like they brought it upon themselves.
Not a good comparison, the sledgehammer isn’t meant to be used in the store, the search function in the website is, don’t be dumb.
I’m only using the tools provided, not accessing anything that’s clearly pointed out I shouldn’t. If anything, that question field is specifically designed for me to use.
What if I wanna learn to code because I want to make more money than what I’m making now but lack creativity to make something like a game or an app that’s supposed to be good practice?
There’s a lot of talk about the backlash making them go back on their decision, and how stockholders weren’t happy seeing the consequences, but I’m wondering how many people actually went to a Wendy’s just to be nosey and ended up buying something because prices hadn’t changed and they were already there, and how many more people will go now that they know prices won’t fluctuate at all.
It almost feels like this helped them just by having people talk about it.
Their twitter guy would’ve been pretty funny with this whole thing.
The way things are going over there Sputz will probably hand everything over as long as they invest. I still remember when the canary quietly went away.
So they get more from the subscription fee without ads than they from the ad revenue? Many also have their own sponsors, right?
Hop-tay’doh
Subscribe, I love these