• 0 Posts
  • 42 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 11th, 2024

help-circle



  • NotJustForMe@lemmy.mltoReddit@lemmy.ml...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess I would also answer that with controversial opinion.

    They don’t want a better platform. Reddit does exactly what they want it to do. To generate tons of discussions about the same things, over and over again. To generate loads of different feelings and situations. To create a very diverse pool of data.

    They might have started out with a good ideology, but then success came.

    I like to compare it with Quora. It could have been the best site of its kind. But it served its purpose, being a feed-bucket for an AI, and now it’s not even moderated anymore. And they did pay their users and mods, but it didn’t work out, too many tiny transactions, only like a handful of people got anything, and those abused it like crazy.

    Just my take on it. Such payment models won’t work. A few giants will earn the majority, and they will cheat and fight for it, the rest will still get nothing. They could have taken three thirds of that CEO money to create a few resident jobs. But why bother, Reddit is exactly how they want it to be. Most users just don’t realize the pseudo-scam, believing it’s their favorite discussion platform that they can influence, while the creators have a content-generator with free labor in mind.


  • NotJustForMe@lemmy.mltoReddit@lemmy.ml...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what, give the CEO half and pay the rest to the mods? Like 1300 bucks per year without tax and fees. What would be left? 50 bucks per month? Reddit has like 75000 moderators. Some for huge Subreddits, some for small ones. Equal pay? Or what?

    Someone has to organize all that paying, many are in different countries, different tax laws. In the end, there would be like 20 bucks per month for each. You then would also require extra heavy checks for moderation quality to ensure they are worth their pay. You’d need systems to prevent abuse. If there’s money involved, people become extra greedy. Just pay some of them? Only the ones working a few hours per day? Pay per moderating action? What?

    Or you just do double pay for the CEO. Seems like a no-brainer.











  • People using an alternative to YouTube are already a very specific minority, and the percentage of those using a plugin on a specific client is even rarer. I wouldn’t go so far to call it a ballpark. Or even a rational source.

    I would agree with you that the data would be highly suspect. It wouldn’t reflect reality at all and should really not be considered.

    On the other hand, YouTube likes and dislikes have been a tool for ages, and they were manipulated. It was never more than a silly toy. It was never accurate data to begin with.