This is the saddest, most insular cope I’ve read all day.

A little, yeah, oddly enough.

Things I’ve learned: the people in this community hate bluesky on principle, their principles are insular and toxic, and they can’t read.

This is why people aren’t going to mastadon more than Bluesky; because y’all’re insufferable. I made the comment in context of the post, so why would you ignore it?

deleted by creator

The fact that you or anyone thinks that matters is part of the problem. Not every federated site needs to be federated with every other federated site. That’s half the point of federation.

Snubbing bluesky is a great way to get people to not take you seriously. When you’re making a recruitment thing like this you need to remember you’re trying to draw in people who don’t fully agree with you.

No.

Jesus Christ what the fuck.

I think the title indicates that it’s like the malware known as “Christmas.exe”.

Edit: I have too much faith in humanity…

Yes!

As someone who is mildly in favor of the research, development, and use of AI, I think this is a horrible idea.

I hope they mean thief the Dark Project and not Thief (2014).

AI is simply not a good way to answer questions.

Wait, Zelda’s on Steam? Why can’t I find it?

🤷‍♂️ I only use local generators at this point,so I don’t care.

I don’t understand how those two things are distinct.

🎼It’s gonna be Blue~~~ Ski~~e~s for yo_u~ and I~ 🎶

You understand that arguments about the legitimacy of law is an argument about whether a law should exist rather than if a law does exist, right?

There’s a difference between saying that someone’s “in the right” (which they’re absolutely not) and saying someone is legally capable of doing what they want. (which is debatable)

There’s no such thing as being too based.

IP law is an illegitimate institution, so no they’re absolutely not.