DarkenLM

Bu there’s no sense crying over every mistake

We just keep on trying till we run out of cake.

wouldn’t be that difficult.

The amount of times I said that only to be quickly proven wrong by the fundamental forces of existence is the reason that’s going to be written on my tombstone.

I don’t think AI codecs will be anything revolutionary. There are plenty of lossless codecs already, but if you want more detail, you’ll need a better physical sensor, and I doubt there’s anything that can be done to go around that (that actually represents what exists, not an hallucination).

Stackoverflow is still very much impossible to replace. The amount of knowledge that it contains is simply too great to fall easily. And LLMs like ChatGPT aren’t even close to being as helpful as SO answers, specially on archaic libraries.

It’s extremely hard to give a machine a sense of morality without having to manually implement it on every node that constitutes their network. Current LLMs aren’t even aware of what they’re printing out, let alone understand the moral implications from that.

The day a machine is truly aware of the morality of what they say, in addition to actually understanding it, then we truly have AI. Currently, we have gargantuan statistical models that people glorify into nigh-godhood.

Sign my petition, damn it!

I have to use W11, but I use ExplorerPatcher to make it bearable.

Look at this fancy guy using an abacus. Everyone knows the superior way is to harness your own mind as your computer.

It’s way worse on C and it’s family. I still have nightmares with undocumented embedded dependencies that are so intertwined with the codebase that make JS look like a godsend.

Servo is being actively worked on. Maybe it can become a worthy adversary to chrome?

I heard the voice line as I was reading it. Excellent and memorable game series.

I’d rather wait until 2025 than having a Cyberpunk 2.0. I waited 10 years, I think I can handle 1 or 2 more.

If it involves pointers, not unlikely.

Honestly, given the context of a browser, Javascript’s “Everything is better than crashing” philosophy does not seem too out-of-place. Yes, the website might break, but at least it would be theoretically usable still.

Yes, a statically typed language would help, but I’d rather not have one that is “these two types are slightly different, fuck you, have a segfault”, but rather one that is slightly more flexible.

With C, you need to carefully craft your own gun with just iron ingots and a hammer. You will shoot yourself in the foot, but at least you’ll have the knowledge that it was your craftsmanship that led to it.

With C++, there are already prebuilt guns and tons of modifications that you can combine at will. If you shove it in the right way, you can make a flintlock shoot a 50 cal, but don’t complain when your whole leg gets obliterated.

And yet somehow it evolved to become something that will last to the heat death of the universe.

I’ve grown used to it with time, though. Once you know it’s “quirks”, it’s not so bad.

In realistic terms, I don’t think the Butlerian Jihad would have that much of a chance. I’d bet on Skynet and it’s Judgment Day happening first.

That is, when AI truly exists. Right now, we have essentially gargantuan amounts of glorified if-else spaghetti.

Or the option that happens in practice: You are just forgotten and people stop contacting you.

People don’t like change, and will resist it. How much depends on the person.

It’s almost like every OS will have issues if you start fucking up core parts of it, who would have guessed?

I am not even American, but I do know that the US Army budget makes the NASA budget look like pocket change.

I’d say you’re focusing on the wrong sector…