Interesting moral question here:
Given the huge problems are power consumption, morals behind training data and blind trust in AI slop, do you think there is a window of acceptable usage for LLMs as locally run (on existing hardware) coding assistant (not executive tool that does it for you) to help with work on FOSS projects (giving back to where it has taken from) with no money flowing to any company (therefore not bolstering that commercial ecosystem)? While this obviously doesn’t address the energy consumption during training, it may alleviates moral issues to the point people start to think about it as acceptable tool.
To make it abundantly clear, this is neither about “vibe coding” where it does code for you badly, and definitely not about any other bullshit like generative “art”. It’s about the question of humble, educated use of a potential useful tool in a way it might be morally acceptable.
No AI, a human chose to insult us with Comic Sans here 💕
Comic Code gang represent
what’s the leaf supposed to mean ?
and what leaf is that anyway ?
This was originally some anti GMO certitifate
To me the leaf must mean that we toke and code, instead of code using AI tokens.
Locally sourced and by free-range developers
You’re allowed out of your cages? Jealous!
Artificial Intelligence ❌️
Natural Stupidity ✔️
No artificial intelligence, just good old natural stupidity
Handcrafted artisinal spaghetti code
So it segfaults after one whole second instead of immediately?
All the certs check out