Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-21 year ago“ARE YOU ALL SEEING THIS”sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1548arrow-down131
arrow-up1517arrow-down1image“ARE YOU ALL SEEING THIS”sh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-21 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year agoRight? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear. I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.
minus-squarephorq@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEspañolarrow-up2·1 year agoOr enemy list, but that might be too presidential…
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoMaybe you jest but now I’m seriously wondering why hasn’t this been proposed. It’s defo better than something like “disallow list”.
Right? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear.
I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.
Sounds like a nono list to me!
Or enemy list, but that might be too presidential…
Maybe you jest but now I’m seriously wondering why hasn’t this been proposed. It’s defo better than something like “disallow list”.
Shit list?