Dendarii
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

The code was very janky, but it worked

i.imgflip.com

message-square
38
fedilink
1

The code was very janky, but it worked

i.imgflip.com

cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
38
fedilink
  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    better to go that way than this (note the weekly downloads)

    • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best is the dependency on the function is_odd.

      • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        dear Lord lmfao

      • jonwyattphillips@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which itself has a dependency of the function is_number.

        • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t

          • Klear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Can’t even or can’t odd? If only there was a way to find out =/

      • spez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is one deep rabbit hole.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      300,000 every week… is this really a feature not built into Java Script?

      • Madlaine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the is_even package does not provide much worth indeed because it simply negates is_odd and thereby all its benefit.

        It’s dependency is_odd on the other hand provides at least some additional checks (it also checks if the value is a valid integer below the max int value)

        And while I would indeed see uses for such methods (especially with the other checks, no simple oneliners) in some cases, especially in testing: This is stuff you write yourself, throw it in a e.g. NumberUtils class and everything is fine. You do never depend on an external library for that. The benefit (not spending a few seconds to write it) does not outweigh any of the drawbacks that come with external libraries.

      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        is this really a feature not built into Java Script?

        x % 2 == 0

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          (+x) % 2 == 0
          

          If you forget for a second it’s Javascript, the language will turn back and bite you.

          • Kindness@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            (+x) % 2 === 0

          • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not good friends with js, what did I miss?

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This evaluates to NaN for some reason:

              '10' % 0
              

              Since JS doesn’t really differentiate strings from numbers, except on the places it does, it makes sense to make sure you are working with numbers.

            • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not a JS dev either but ===.

              Not really sure what the (+x) is about

              • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                the remainder operator should return a number or a NaN right? do we actually need the triple here?

                • marcos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Not really. But with JS it’s better safe than sorry.

                  The GP’s addition is unnecessary, but I fully support anyone that decides to do it.

                  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    point taken!

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              JS is a language where [1,2,11].sort() returns [1,11,2].

              And if you use a variable instead of a bare array, half the functions are side-effectful, as determined by coin toss.

              And if you try declaring that variable with new Array(3).map() then it will ignore all 3 indices, because undefined is real enough to be enumerated, but not real enough to be iterated, because, and I cannot overstress the importance of this principle in Javascript, go fuck yourself. Go fuck yourself is why.

              • PoolloverNathan@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Array(3) doesn’t create [undefined, undefined, undefined, ]; it creates [/* hole */, /* hole */, /* hole */, ]. The holes don’t set any property on the array whatsoever, so they are skipped when iterating. How this makes sense, I can’t tell you.

                • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Time is a flat circle

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yet the array contains exactly three nothings.

                  It’s like a zen koan.

              • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                We wrote it wrong on purpose, as a joke.

              • Kindness@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                typeof(null) == ‘object’

                Because some people think planning an entirely new language should take less than 2 weeks. 10 days, in this case.

                See wat for more.

          • affiliate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            what does the +x do.

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It makes sure x is a number.

              • affiliate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                what a wonderful and beautiful language. i’m so glad i asked

    • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      True

    • gigachad@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao

    • hackris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I was a JS programmer, I’d just write a bash script to download it every week for fun.

Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml

programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 14 users / day
  • 39 users / week
  • 181 users / month
  • 1.61K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 35.6K subscribers
  • 1.78K Posts
  • 36.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • cat_programmer@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org